Recent searches
Search options
Apparently I need to sign a terms of use to launch a goddamn browser now
https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/114071999359445580
Also, per their "simplified terms page" [www.mozilla.org] [apologies for the bastardized Chromium link]:
" > Your use of Firefox must follow Mozilla's Acceptable Use Policy,
In said policy,
You may not use any of Mozilla's services to:
- Upload, download, transmit, display, or grant access to content that includes graphic depictions of sexuality"
huh
i beg your fucking pardon
since when the fuck does Mozilla get any say about acceptable use of my fucking browser
@LiquidParasyte What's Bluesky done this time? I've blocked Bluesky talk here since it tends to be one-sided tbh. Last I heard was them joining ROOST as a partner.
US Politics, AI slop, Bluesky, censorship
@Flaky A gov't employee inside Housing and Urban Development made a AI generated protest video with Trump sucking Elon Musk's toes, and Bluesky removed the post from the journalist who reposted it because of it being "non-consensual sexual content."
For normal people this would probably be justified, but in the context of criticizing power/the government this arguably is impeding free speech/First Amendment lines, especially sensitive considering Big Tech Social is all but integrating into the state as an oligarchy and people are trying to rise against a fascist dictatorship.
re: US Politics, AI slop, Bluesky, censorship
@LiquidParasyte Ahhh. It's probably them just being needlessly strict on AI generated porn tbh. Trust and safety stuff is really hard to deal with. I agree that Joseph shouldn't have had it removed though.