Ercanbrack<p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/LinuxTablet" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LinuxTablet</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/LinuxAudio" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LinuxAudio</span></a> </p><p>Supposedly <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/RedHat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RedHat</span></a> has decided to depreciate <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/VirtManager" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>VirtManager</span></a> in favor of <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Cockpit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Cockpit</span></a>. Cockpit will likely get Red Hat’s money instead of Virt-Manager, although development of Virt-Manager will still continue—likely independently. Cockpit seems modern and nice, but apparently requires hosts and guests to use <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Systemd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Systemd</span></a>, which would rule out my usage of virtualizing OSes like <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Androidx86" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Androidx86</span></a>, I believe. I guess I could use <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/VirtualBox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>VirtualBox</span></a> for those OSes in given no other option.</p>