Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@charlesmok" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>charlesmok</span></a></span> no, it's just a sign of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/incompetence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>incompetence</span></a> re: <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/InfoSec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>InfoSec</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/OpSec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpSec</span></a>, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ComSec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ComSec</span></a> & <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ITsec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ITsec</span></a> as this is a <em>criminally gross violation</em> of standards that even <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/POTUS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>POTUS</span></a> has to abide to.</p><ul><li>There's a reason the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/US" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>US</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/MILINTEL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MILINTEL</span></a> have half a dozen different <em>"secure networks"</em> for comms ranging from unclassified to top-secret+nofor!</li></ul><p><a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> should've been forced to hand over his personal devices at entry of the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SCIF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SCIF</span></a> this was sent from and only allowed on sanctioned and certified systems with vetted contacts only as pre-appointed who themselves are in a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitive_compartmented_information_facility" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SCIF</a></p><ul><li>This is such a huge <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/OpSec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpSec</span></a> failure, it makes <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/WarThunderForumsLeaks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WarThunderForumsLeaks</span></a> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Thunder#Classified_document_leaks" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">look</a> like a minor indiscretion by comparison.</li></ul>