Pixel is the smallest dragon<p>48 hours of data<br>Day 1: humidifier on the highest setting for around 2 hours before bed in an enclosed room to maintain humidity<br>Day 2: no humidifier in a room with open interior doors</p><p>The goal is still 50% humidity. Humidity is nearly identical overnight at around 40%, though overnight indoor temperature was 72 degrees rather than 66. I don't think I could afford to pay to heat my entire apt just to keep the humidity up, especially when heat and its CO2 isn't what I want. Running a humidifier all night and paying for the water doesn't sound great, but it's potentially more affordable.</p><p>The air quality is also not that much improved. Rather than being slightly above 1000 ppm, it's slightly below, with an extra hour before reaching 900 ppm, though it does stagnate below 1000 ppm overall. Basically, I enough CO2 overnight in a 600 sq ft studio apartment to barely stay below acceptable levels. I probably should open a window if someone else is here. </p><p>Future experiments<br>- humidifier off and the doors closed (to see how much the CO2 increase is caused by being in an enclosed space)<br>- humidifier on it's lowest setting all night (with a kill-a-watt to measure energy consumption)<br>- windows open </p><p><a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/humidity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>humidity</span></a> <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/airGradient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>airGradient</span></a> <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/airQuality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>airQuality</span></a> <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/openSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openSource</span></a> <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/openHardware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openHardware</span></a></p>